Hi Fab, On Tue, 2006-02-21 at 11:15, Fabian Tillier wrote: > On 21 Feb 2006 09:42:10 -0500, Hal Rosenstock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tue, 2006-02-21 at 01:10, Fabian Tillier wrote: > > > The lack of detailed error reporting in SA queries could stand to be > > > improved, and something as simple as the SA returning a component mask > > > indicating which components caused conflicts would be extremely useful > > > in determining the next course of action.
Or at least 1 component mask bit of a conflict... Interesting idea :-) > ERR_REQ_INVALID is just too > > > broad in this case to allow the code to do anything intelligent. > > > > I think ERR_REQ_UNREALIZABLE helps here. > > What is this ERR_REQ_UNREALIZABLE that you speak of? Where is it > documented? I only see ERR_REQ_INVALID in the 1.2 spec, perhaps I > need to look at an errata of sorts? You're right; Unrealizable == ERR_REQ_INVALID so there is no easy way to tell the difference. -- Hal > Thanks, > > - Fab _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
