Quoting r. Sean Hefty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Subject: Re: [openib-general] Re: Re: Re: [PATCH] change Mellanox > SDP?workaround toa moduleparameter > > Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > >Okay, but then we need to implement the REJ/retry sequence. > >I think it affects at least CMA and maybe CM. > > I believe that this sort of retry need to be initiated by the ULP.
Okay, but we still need the CM to generate the approriate REJ with code 26, right? > The CMA needs some additional work to permit re-using an rdma_cm_id after a > connection has been rejected, so that the user or CMA can modify the MTU > before trying to re-establish a connection. Given that the issue only affects some hardware, it would be nice to somehow hide this from ULPs, otherwise it seems unlikely that they will get it right. -- Michael S. Tsirkin Staff Engineer, Mellanox Technologies _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
