On Fri, 2006-02-24 at 09:47 -0800, Bryan O'Sullivan wrote: > On Fri, 2006-02-24 at 12:31 -0500, Hal Rosenstock wrote: > > > I don't understand RC, UC, UD being separately listed here. > > Just completeness. > > > > Userland software: > > > > > > * libibverbs > > > * libsdp > > > * opensm > > > > There are diags as well as OpenSM in the management directory. > > Do you want the diags in, or out? They're not packaged in any way, so > I'd vote for "out".
Customers need them "in". - Matt > > > Also, what about librdmacm ? libibcm ? > > > > > As far as I can tell, most of the rest of OpenIB userland (libibcm, > > > libibat, libibmad, etc) is logically part of OpenSM, > > > > libibmad (and libibcommon and libibumad) are but libibcm and libibat are > > not. I believe libibat as well as the core at and user_at are > > superceeded by addr and libibrdma. > > OK. What kinds of states are the old and new libraries in? I'd rather > not ship a library and its proposed replacement. > > <b > > _______________________________________________ > openib-general mailing list > [email protected] > http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general > > To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general > _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
