Quoting r. Sean Hefty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >I think we can use the method field for this.
> >C15-0.1.18:
> >
> >...
> >. The method used for all packets sent from the Receiver to the Sender
> >shall be SubnAdmGetTable() or SubnAdmGetTraceTable(), depending
> >on which initiated the transfer.
> >
> >. The method used for all packets sent from the Sender to the Receiver
> >shall be SubnAdmGetTableResp().
>
> I'd like to resist putting protocol specific knowledge into the MAD layer
> as much as possible. Such a fix is unlikely to apply in more generic
> cases. I believe that this is an architectural issue that would be best
> addressed at that level.
I dont see a way around this: the dirt is at the spec level.
You just said:
I don't believe that there's any way to know if an
abort is for an RMPP message that is being sent, versus received.
Did you change your mind then?
--
Michael S. Tsirkin
Staff Engineer, Mellanox Technologies
_______________________________________________
openib-general mailing list
[email protected]
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
