Quoting r. Sean Hefty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Subject: [PATCH] RFC Verbs: add support for transport specific verbs > > Add support for transport specific extensions to the ib_device verbs. > Relocate process_mad as an IB specific verb. > > This provides a mechanism to add iWarp specific functionality, such as > the iWarp CM calls, to ib_device. > > Signed-off-by: Sean Hefty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Is it worth it to separate these things out? Even within IB lots of methods are optional - so why cant an iWarp device just avoid defining process_local_mad, and IB device avoid defining iWarp CM ops? -- Michael S. Tsirkin Staff Engineer, Mellanox Technologies _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
