On 11:23 Wed 01 Mar , Hal Rosenstock wrote: > > > > After more thinking: there is no big reason to make osm_svn_revision.h > > distributible - this will be recreated in build time anyway. Right? > > Right. The dist make should cause it to be regenerated and I think it > would indicate exported.
Exactly. Sasha. > > -- Hal > > > Ofer, Vladimir, could you try this: > > > > > > diff --git a/osm/include/Makefile.am b/osm/include/Makefile.am > > index 68e60bf..e1f7070 100644 > > --- a/osm/include/Makefile.am > > +++ b/osm/include/Makefile.am > > @@ -4,7 +4,6 @@ nobase_pkginclude_HEADERS = iba/ib_types > > > > EXTRA_DIST = \ > > $(srcdir)/opensm/osm_version.h \ > > - $(srcdir)/opensm/osm_svn_revision.h \ > > $(srcdir)/opensm/osm_sa_portinfo_record_ctrl.h \ > > $(srcdir)/opensm/osm_sa_guidinfo_record_ctrl.h \ > > $(srcdir)/opensm/osm_sa_path_record.h \ > > > > > > Just to be sure, I checked it with: > > > > ./autogen.sh && ./configure --disable-libcheck && make dist && make > > > > but my dev tree may be dirty. > > > > Sasha. > _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
