Quoting Roland Dreier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Subject: Re: [PATCH] RFC Verbs: add support for transport specific verbs > > Michael> I agree. Roland, what you might have missed is that the > Michael> first solution posted added a requirement to check device > Michael> type *in addition to checking the method is non-NULL and > Michael> its return code* on each transport-specific call, so it > Michael> had run-time penalty. > > I don't think I really agree with you that the device type checks are > necessary in most places. For example, if we reach code that wants to > call the process_mad method, then we must already know that we're > dealing with an IB device.
Sure. But still. There's already discussion in this thread on moving multicast stuff to ib-specific until iwarp defines it. -- Michael S. Tsirkin Staff Engineer, Mellanox Technologies _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
