Bill just took the first e-mail (first in a long thread) from Brian. If you read up on it you'll see that the thread, IMO, ended in favor of SRP and possibly iSER as a part or 1.0
/Peter On Tuesday 28 February 2006 15:19, Weber, Bret wrote: > Bill, This is the first that I have heard of the desire for some to drop > SRP and iSER. > > These are our storage protocols and the defined standard methods to run > SCSI over IB to native IB storage (or any other RDMA based wire). > > Active testing is going on with feedback being given back to the > developers on these drivers. > > Storage is a major part of the promise of IB, RDMA, and Unified wire. > > We can't be looking at dropping it now. It was late getting into the > gen 2 stack, but now that it is in, storage vendors are ramping up on > it. > > Bret -- ------------------------------------------------------------ Peter Kjellström | National Supercomputer Centre | Sweden | http://www.nsc.liu.se
pgpuBvKvKiTIi.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
