Quoting r. Sean Hefty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Subject: RE: Re: RFC: e2e credits > > >> So, how about we add a flag to ib_qp_init_attr? > >> Something like > >> responder_invalid_credits > >> > >> Which will, for RC QPs, cause the responder to always > >> generate invalid credits, effectively disabling hardware E2E > >> flow control for this receive queue. ULPs will turn this on > >> if they do implement flow control in software and make sure that RNR > >> is never generated. > > At first glance, this sounds reasonable. This could end up breaking the > ABI somewhere (verbs, CM, CMA?), but I'm not sure. How does this map to > the IB CM flow control parameter? (I'm at a traveler's PC at the > moment, and don't have access to the specs.) Is the IB CM flow control > parameter actually used anywhere, or just exchanged by the remote sides? > > - Sean > (Sorry if this breaks threading.)
I think that the CM flow control parameter affects the requestor. This option is for responder. -- Michael S. Tsirkin Staff Engineer, Mellanox Technologies _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
