On 3/13/06, James Lentini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Wed, 8 Mar 2006, Hal Rosenstock wrote: > > > On Tue, 2006-03-07 at 20:56, Bryan O'Sullivan wrote: > > > On Tue, 2006-03-07 at 17:45 -0800, Sean Hefty wrote: > > > > Bryan O'Sullivan wrote: > > > > > libibat > > > > > libibat-debuginfo > > > > > libibat-devel > > > > > libibat-utils > > > > > > > > The kernel modules to support these are obsolete. We should > > > > remove them from the release. > > > > > > Fine by me :-) Are we killing off the kernel code, too, in > > > parallel? > > > > I'm still waiting to hear all consumers have moved to addr/CMA. > > The kDAPL OpenIB provider still uses IBAT. > > I'd like to see a copy of this code available from OpenIB, but it does > not have to be on the trunk. For my purposes a copy in > > https://openib.org/svn/gen2/branches/shaharf-ibat > > would be acceptable.
Do you plan to continue using this code ? > Any chance that this branch's at.c and at_priv.h > could be updated to match the versions on the trunk? > > I don't know the state of the shaharf-ibat branch. The shaharf-ibat branch was not maintained. >If the current IBAT > code wouldn't be consistent with that branch, I don't mind keeping the > current IBAT code at > > https://openib.org/svn/gen2/users/jlentini/ibat > _______________________________________________ > openib-general mailing list > [email protected] > http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general > > To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general >
_______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
