On Tue, 2006-03-14 at 16:37, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > I thought about this, and I noted that with current CM > the flow control flag is already set by ULP, per connection. > I currently don't see this as spec violation: there's no compliance statement > that requires this bit to have the same value for all connections. The spec > says: > "Signifies whether the local CA actually implements End-to-End Flow Control > (1), or instead always advertises .invalid credits.(0)." > and we just take this meaning, with a clarification: "for this connection".
I'd be curious what the CM authors would think of this as to whether it is a clarification and their original intent or not. -- Hal _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
