On Thu, 2006-03-16 at 10:45 -0500, James Lentini wrote: > > On Thu, 16 Mar 2006, Steve Wise wrote: > > swise> Just to clarify: Tom is talking about iWARP devices here that support > swise> the native stack -and- the rdma stack with the same offload device. > For > swise> IB devices, the above "collision" doesn't matter because IB really > swise> doesn't use the ip addresses at all after the RC is setup. AND, the > swise> native stack TCP support in IB (IPoIB) uses a different QP and service > swise> type (UD). So there's no problem with said collision. > > If there is a fix for the iWARP collision problem, wouldn't there be > an analogous fix for IB? Why wouldn't we make that fix?
Perhaps. To be honest, I have followed the SDP/IB side of this thread enough... I just wanted to make a point that iwarp devices have a different issue. Steve. _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
