"Sean Hefty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >I'm not exactly happy that this tree adds tons of RDMA CM > >EXPORT_SYMBOL's that are neither currently used nor _GPL. > > The symbols are used by the kernel component that provides userspace support. >
There's brevity and then there is obscurity. +EXPORT_SYMBOL(rdma_wq); +EXPORT_SYMBOL(rdma_translate_ip); +EXPORT_SYMBOL(rdma_resolve_ip); +EXPORT_SYMBOL(rdma_addr_cancel); +EXPORT_SYMBOL(rdma_create_id); +EXPORT_SYMBOL(rdma_create_qp); +EXPORT_SYMBOL(rdma_destroy_qp); +EXPORT_SYMBOL(rdma_init_qp_attr); +EXPORT_SYMBOL(rdma_destroy_id); +EXPORT_SYMBOL(rdma_listen); +EXPORT_SYMBOL(rdma_resolve_route); +EXPORT_SYMBOL(rdma_resolve_addr); +EXPORT_SYMBOL(rdma_bind_addr); +EXPORT_SYMBOL(rdma_connect); +EXPORT_SYMBOL(rdma_accept); +EXPORT_SYMBOL(rdma_reject); +EXPORT_SYMBOL(rdma_disconnect); +EXPORT_SYMBOL(ib_get_rmpp_segment); +EXPORT_SYMBOL(ib_copy_qp_attr_to_user); +EXPORT_SYMBOL(ib_copy_path_rec_to_user); +EXPORT_SYMBOL(ib_copy_path_rec_from_user); +EXPORT_SYMBOL(ib_modify_qp_is_ok); +EXPORT_SYMBOL(ip_dev_find); Some or all of those exports have no in-tree users. What code will use them? Is it planned that this code be merged? Please explain the thinking behind the choice of a non-GPL export. (Yes, we discussed this when inifiniband was first merged, but it doesn't hurt to reiterate). _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
