On Thu, 2006-03-16 at 14:38 -0800, Roland Dreier wrote: > I need to think about how to handle the other attributes. Probably > anything that just copies values from the struct ib_qp passed in to > the function should at least be in the generic ib_query_qp function, > since there's no good reason for every low-level driver to duplicate it. > Probably this is how it should be done
> However I'm wondering whether we even have the right interface for > query QP at all. The only thing that the consumer couldn't have saved > off for themselves is the QP state, so maybe the right interface is > just an ib_query_qp_state() function that gives back the QP's current state. > I think we should pass to the consumer all the info in a centralized way through a standard query_qp verb. _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
