On Thu, 2006-03-23 at 11:41, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > Quoting r. Hal Rosenstock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Subject: Re: RFC: e2e credits > > > > On Thu, 2006-03-23 at 11:13, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > Quoting r. Hal Rosenstock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > >Sean, just to wrap it up, the API at the verbs layer will look like > > > > > >the > > > > > >below, and then ULPs just put the value they want in the CM and CM > > > > > >will > > > > > >pass it in to low level. > > > > > > > > > > I'm fine with this, but I do think that it's a minor spec > > > > > violation/enhancement, so I'd like to get agreement with Hal, Roland, > > > > > and > > > > > other HCA vendors about this change. > > > > > > > > I too think this is a (minor) spec change. I recommended checking with > > > > the CM authors on it. > > > > > > Why are you saying its a spec change? Because now the same HCA might > > > return > > > different values at different times? > > > > I think that's a creative interpretation of what the spec says (or > > perhaps doesn't say) but that's just my $0.02 worth. > > OK, could you check this with the relevant people please?
Is there a reason you can't ? Mellanox has people who participate in the relevant IBTA WGs. -- Hal _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
