On Mon, 2006-03-20 at 12:31 -0800, Matt Leininger wrote: > On Mon, 2006-03-20 at 11:02 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > > BTW, Matt, it might be interesting to compare > > 2.6.13-rc3 patch 1 against -rc1 and -rc2 with patch 1, to try and track > > down the last bit of performance degradation in IPoIB. > > > > Could you look into this? > Here are the latest IPoIB performance numbers. I added the two kernels you requested and some 2.6.16 results.
All benchmarks are with RHEL4 x86_64 with HCA FW v4.7.0 dual EM64T 3.2 GHz PCIe IB HCA (memfull) ipath results RHE4 x86_64 with HTX HCA dual socket dual core 2.4 GHz patch 1 - remove changeset 314324121f9b94b2ca657a494cf2b9cb0e4a28cc patch 2 - remove changeset b8259d9ad1d0f8d0c5ea0e37bb15080b0bd395b5 msi_x=1 for all PCIe tests netperf -f -M -c -C -H IP_ADDRESS Kernel OpenIB netperf (MB/s) 2.6.16 svn 6083 371 (mthca ipoib) 2.6.16 svn 6083 304 (ipath ipoib) 2.6.16 svn 5938 300 (ipath ipoib) 2.6.16 svn 5938 380 (mthca ipoib) 2.6.16 in-kernel 364 2.6.16-rc5 in-kernel 367 2.6.15 in-kernel 382 2.6.14-rc4 patch 12 in-kernel 436 2.6.14-rc4 patch 1 in-kernel 434 2.6.14-rc4 in-kernel 385 2.6.14-rc3 in-kernel 374 2.6.13.2 svn3627 386 2.6.13.2 patch 1 svn3627 446 2.6.13.2 in-kernel 394 2.6.13-rc3 patch 12 in-kernel 442 2.6.13-rc3 patch 1 in-kernel 450 2.6.13-rc3 in-kernel 395 2.6.13-rc2 patch 1 in-kernel 409 2.6.13-rc1 patch 1 in-kernel 408 2.6.12.5-lustre in-kernel 399 2.6.12.5 patch 1 in-kernel 464 2.6.12.5 in-kernel 402 2.6.12 in-kernel 406 2.6.12-rc6 patch 1 in-kernel 470 2.6.12-rc6 in-kernel 407 2.6.12-rc5 in-kernel 405 2.6.12-rc5 patch 1 in-kernel 474 2.6.12-rc4 in-kernel 470 2.6.12-rc3 in-kernel 466 2.6.12-rc2 in-kernel 469 2.6.12-rc1 in-kernel 466 2.6.11 in-kernel 464 2.6.11 svn3687 464 2.6.9-11.ELsmp svn3513 425 (Woody's results, 3.6Ghz EM64T) - Matt _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
