Quoting r. Sean Hefty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] ib_addr: local/loopback address handling
>
> Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >> if (ZERONET(src_ip)) {
> >> src_in->sin_family = dst_in->sin_family;
> >> src_in->sin_addr.s_addr = dst_ip;
> >> ret = copy_addr(addr, dev, dev->dev_addr);
> >> } else if (LOOPBACK(src_ip)) {
> >> ret = rdma_translate_ip((struct sockaddr *)dst_in, addr);
> >> if (!ret)
> >> memcpy(addr->dst_dev_addr, dev->dev_addr,
> >> MAX_ADDR_LEN);
> >> } else {
> >> ret = rdma_translate_ip((struct sockaddr *)src_in, addr);
> >> if (!ret)
> >> memcpy(addr->dst_dev_addr, dev->dev_addr,
> >> MAX_ADDR_LEN);
> >> }
> >
> >This will put the IP of an actual IB device in the SDP hello message,
> >right?
> >I don't think we should have 127.0.0.1 there ...
>
> After some testing, this appears to work the way I expected anyway.
>
> My test system has a local IP address of 192.168.0.102.
>
> I could connect from 127.0.0.1 to 127.0.0.1, 192.168.0.102 to 127.0.0.1,
> and 127.0.0.1 to 192.168.0.102. I could not connect between 127.0.0.1 to
> 192.168.0.101, which is my other test system.
>
> I believe that this does carry 127.0.0.1 in the connection messages, since
> that's the address that we're bound to.
Sean, this wasn't ever checked in, was it? If so, please do.
--
Michael S. Tsirkin
Staff Engineer, Mellanox Technologies
_______________________________________________
openib-general mailing list
[email protected]
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
