On Tue, 2006-04-04 at 16:19 -0700, Roland Dreier wrote: > Robert> Which of these #defines is valid in 2.6.17? Just curious. > Robert> What we have in svn matches what you put in your git tree, > Robert> you see... Perhaps an #ifdef until 2.6.17 goes through? > > 2.6.17 still has IB_NODE_CA. The svn tree has some iWARP-related > changes that make it RDMA_NODE_IB_CA, but those haven't been merged > upstream and won't be in 2.6.17.
Would an ifdef be OK? -- Robert Walsh Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PathScale, Inc. Phone: +1 650 934 8117 2071 Stierlin Court, Suite 200 Fax: +1 650 428 1969 Mountain View, CA 94043.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
