Quoting r. Sean Hefty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > My preference, and it's not a very strong one at this point, is to push the > responsibility into the module invoking the callback. To me, that's the > direction that the reference goes, so that's where the responsibility lies. > Besides, it's his thread that's executing random memory as code.
Sure: that's the only way it can be done, so either the invoking module (sa) has to take reference on module that has the callback, or the callback module has to notify the invoking one that its unloading. I like the second approach better. -- MST _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
