On Thu, 2006-04-06 at 15:51, Roland Dreier wrote:
> > + dev = kmalloc(sizeof *dev + device->phys_port_cnt * sizeof *port,
> > + GFP_KERNEL);
> > + if (!dev)
> > + return;
> > +
> > + for (i = 1; i <= device->phys_port_cnt; i++) {
>
> Seems like this is implicitly assuming that the IB device is a CA.
>
> Maybe we should give up the ghost and stop trying to support IB switches?
I would prefer not to. SMI changes for switches have been provided but
not integrated as yet. Enhanced switch port 0 would need this (at a
minimum).
-- Hal
_______________________________________________
openib-general mailing list
[email protected]
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
