Quoting r. Sean Hefty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Subject: RE: Re: librdmacm/ucma
> 
> >Put another way - why do you already have backward compatibility hacks
> >in lirdmacm? There wasn't any released version of cma, was there?
> 
> Because the behavior of the ABI changed.  The CMA was released to openib, but
> has not yet been merged upstream.  What is the issue here?  The CMA ABI now
> behaves similar to the other userspace components.

I just propose killing old ABI support in librdmacm - CMA is sufficiently
new for that.

-- 
MST
_______________________________________________
openib-general mailing list
[email protected]
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general

To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general

Reply via email to