Hi Hal, This is correct. OpenSM does not support RE_INIT. I think I meant adding ClientReRegistration capability.
Good catch Eitan Zahavi Design Technology Director Mellanox Technologies LTD Tel:+972-4-9097208 Fax:+972-4-9593245 P.O. Box 586 Yokneam 20692 ISRAEL > -----Original Message----- > From: Hal Rosenstock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, April 10, 2006 3:34 PM > To: Eitan Zahavi > Cc: OPENIB > Subject: Re: [PATCH] osm: add support for 1.2 errata - SA enhancedcapability mask > matching > > Hi Eitan, > > On Mon, 2006-04-03 at 03:11, Eitan Zahavi wrote: > > Hi Hal > > > > This patch adds support for the following 1.2 errata MGTWG8372. > > This should be useful for scalability of: > > * SRP target discovery and > > * Queries for all SM ports. > > > > Reference ID: 4291 > > > > Add to table: 186 SA-Specific ClassPortInfo:CapabilityMask > > Name | Bit | Description > > > ======================================================================== ==== > =============== > > IsPortInfoCapMaskMatchSupported | 13 | If this value is 1, SA shall support > matching the > > | | PortInfo:CapabilityMask component as described in > > | | <ref to section 15.2.5.3>. > > > > Reference ID: 4292 > > If SA's ClassPortInfo:CapabilityMask.IsPortInfoCapMaskMatchSupported is 1, > > then the AttributeModifier of the SubnAdmGet() and SubnAdmGetTable() > > methods affects the matching behavior on the PortInfo:CapabilityMask > > component. If the high-order bit (bit 31) of the AttributeModifier > > is set to 1, matching on the CapabilityMask component will not be an > > exact bitwise match as described in <ref to 15.4.4>. Instead, > > matching will only be performed on those bits which are set to 1 in > > the PortInfo:CapabilityMask embedded in the query. > > > > In <ref to o15-0.x.y>, bits in the PortInfo:CapabilityMask embedded > > in the query that are set to 0 are bitwise wildcards for purposes of > > matching. > > > > This gives a requester the ability to select desired capabilities > > and query for ports which support those capabilities. > > > > If SA's ClassPortInfo:CapabilityMask.IsPortInfoCapMaskMatchSupported > > is 0, or if bit 31 of the AttributeModifier is 0, then any matching > > performed on the PortInfo:CapabilityMask component is as described > > in <ref to 15.4.4>. > > > > Eitan > > > > Signed-off-by: Eitan Zahavi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > ... > > > Index: opensm/osm_sa_class_port_info.c > > =================================================================== > > --- opensm/osm_sa_class_port_info.c (revision 6144) > > +++ opensm/osm_sa_class_port_info.c (working copy) > > @@ -212,15 +212,21 @@ __osm_cpi_rcv_respond( > > MultiPathRecord, > > TraceRecord > > > > - OSM_CAP_IS_SUBN_OPT_REINIT_SUP: > > + OSM_CAP_IS_REINIT_SUP: > > For reinitialization functionality. > > > > So not sending traps, but supporting Get(Notice) and Set(Notice): > > */ > > - p_resp_cpi->cap_mask = 0x2; /* Note host notation replaced later */ > > + > > + /* Note host notation replaced later */ > > + p_resp_cpi->cap_mask = 0x2; /* Generic mask: support Get/Set attributes */ > > + > > if (p_rcv->p_subn->opt.no_multicast_option != TRUE) > > p_resp_cpi->cap_mask |= OSM_CAP_IS_UD_MCAST_SUP; > > > > + p_resp_cpi->cap_mask |= OSM_CAP_IS_REINIT_SUP; > > OpenSM doesn't support node reinit so this bit shouldn't be on, right ? > > -- Hal _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
