Hi Roland, Over the last two weeks we have posted another RFC on the iser code, to both openib and linux scsi. Upto now no new comments were made other then those provided (and fixed) by Christoph Hellwig on the first RFC we posted to openib.
Do you find it need/appropriate to post another RFC, this time to LKML? Also (and related to both reviewes and upstream) iser is dependent on two change sets for 2.6.18: first, the cma and second, the bunch of 2.6.18 iscsi updates (it is six patches from which iser directly is dependent on two, but we prefer to treat all the six as needed for iser to compile/work). The six iscsi patches were pushed to linux-scsi but are not yet in the scsi-misc git tree, they can also be found under https://openib.org/svn/gen2/trunk/src/linux-kernel/patches/2.6.17 it is the 01 to 06 sequence. As for the upstream process, i guess each of you and James would need to do git pull from the other one into the scsi-misc (2.6.18 rdma updates) and the infiniband (2.6.18 scsi updates) so iser can be compiled with both trees, or at least with your tree. Please let me know what do you think. thanks, Or. _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
