On Wednesday 19 April 2006 22:17, Arlin Davis wrote:
> >>>>>>OpenIB-cma u1.2 nonthreadsafe default /usr/lib/libdaplcma.so 
> >>>>>>mv_dapl.1.2 "mthca0 1" ""
> >>>>>>OpenIB-cma0-1 u1.2 nonthreadsafe default /usr/lib/libdaplcma.so 
> >>>>>>mv_dapl.1.2 "mthca0 1" ""
> >>>>>>OpenIB-cma0-2 u1.2 nonthreadsafe default /usr/lib/libdaplcma.so 
> >>>>>>mv_dapl.1.2 "mthca0 2" ""
> >>>>>>OpenIB-cma1-1 u1.2 nonthreadsafe default /usr/lib/libdaplcma.so 
> >>>>>>mv_dapl.1.2 "mthca1 1" ""
> >>>>>>OpenIB-cma1-2 u1.2 nonthreadsafe default /usr/lib/libdaplcma.so 
> >>>>>>mv_dapl.1.2 "mthca1 2" ""
> >>>>>>
> These entries are wrong. The cma versopm will only work with an ip 
> address,  network hostname, or netdev name. The port value is 
> meaningless since the name gives you the device and port reference all 
> in one.
> 
> For cma the best flavor is netdev name as follow:
> 
> OpenIB-cma u1.2 nonthreadsafe default /usr/lib/libdaplcma.so mv_dapl.1.2 "ib0 
> 0" ""
> 
> because it allows you to have identical dat.conf setups on across your 
> cluster if you intend on using the first IB interface on each node.

but, what if one wants to work with the second ib I/F (or with the third)?

If in automatic way i will create a dat.conf that will have the following lines 
(on a machine with 2 HCAs, 2 port in each HCA):

OpenIB-cma u1.2 nonthreadsafe default /usr/lib/libdaplcma.so mv_dapl.1.2 "ib0 
0" ""
OpenIB-cma0 u1.2 nonthreadsafe default /usr/lib/libdaplcma.so mv_dapl.1.2 "ib0 
0" ""
OpenIB-cma1 u1.2 nonthreadsafe default /usr/lib/libdaplcma.so mv_dapl.1.2 "ib1 
0" ""
OpenIB-cma2 u1.2 nonthreadsafe default /usr/lib/libdaplcma.so mv_dapl.1.2 "ib2 
0" ""
OpenIB-cma3 u1.2 nonthreadsafe default /usr/lib/libdaplcma.so mv_dapl.1.2 "ib3 
0" ""

In this file, there is a dapl provider name for every IPoIB I/F, and still 
there is a default entry (the first I/F).

Is this is usefull?

Dotan
_______________________________________________
openib-general mailing list
[email protected]
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general

To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general

Reply via email to