On Tue, 2006-04-25 at 00:46 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > Quoting r. Sean Hefty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > This sounds like an SDP over CMA specific issue, correct? Meaning that an > > rdma_unbind call is only needed by SDP? > > Hmm. As I see it, keeping the QP alive for a given timeout after user > requested > close is a simple way to implement graceful close, not limited to sockets. > On the other hand, we need to free the port immediately. > > So its easy for me to imagine another kernel ULP (besides SDP) wanting this. > No idea whether it might be useful for userspace as well. >
What specifically are you trying to implement ... shutdown()? Is there some WHCL test that's failing? Help ;-)? _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
