On Wed, 26 Apr 2006, Hal Rosenstock wrote:
> As AT and user AT have been obsoleted (and superceeded by CMA which > is now in the process of going upstream), any objections to removing > AT and user AT from the trunk ? If I don't hear back by COB Friday, > I will presume this is OK. I'm in agreement with moving this off of the trunk. Will the code still be available for reference? _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
