Shirley Ma wrote:
Without seeing your patch, I coudn't say anything. I guess your
implemention
didn't handler multithreads simultanously. If you only have one
interrupt handler,
couldn't see any reason you can get better performance number with
splitting CQs.
Shirley, you are right.
I just wanted share our experience with you.
All the tests we made on our IPoIB driver, so our NAPI implementation
isn't relevant here.
Unfortunately, we didn't plan to work on the IPoIB performance in the
nearest future, so I can't
implement NAPI on the OpenIB driver right now.
I think it would be very interesting to compare the NAPI performance
against the work queue.
Please let me know if you are planning to do it yourself.
Could you please post your NAPI patch here?
As I mentioned I will test my patch to see how's the performance.
Thank you,
Leonid
_______________________________________________
openib-general mailing list
[email protected]
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
