[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> Go ahead. BTW, I'm reasonably sure CMA does not check MajV at least >> in incoming HelloAck. I think since you must check it in incoming >> Hello in CMA, its best to check it in incoming HelloAck in CMA as >> well. >> >> Another validation check needed in CMA: >> >> CA4-17: The accepting peer shall reject the connection if IPV of the >> HH has a value other than 0x4 or 0x6. > > Note that I would like to keep as much of the SDP protocol > out of the CMA as possible. I agree that this check should be in the > CMA. >
Could the CMA handoff parsing/evaluation of the Hello/HelloAck exchange much the way it hands off private data to the ULP? _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
