>> And I don't believe that case 3 exists either, but would end up being treated >as >> DS RMPP by the implementation. > >Why ? Just wondering... > >> If case 3 doesn't exist, then I think we can >> come up with a generic way to identify DS RMPP that doesn't require checking >> class or methods. > >How ?
The MAD layer can assume that any RMPP request that expects a response is DS RMPP. This is a simple check that doesn't involve looking at the class or method. If the check is incorrect, and it's an RMPP request followed by a non-RMPP response, then we send an extra ACK of the final ACK. I'm not sure if the extra ACK would cause any problems. >> If case 3 does exist, then I think we'll need class / method >> checking to identify DS RMPP. > >By doesn't exist, do you mean not possible in the architecture or no >current use cases like this ? No use cases. - Sean _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
