On Mon, 2006-05-01 at 11:35, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > Hello! > I have replaced the SDP code on trunk with new, much smaller code base, > based on CMA. Note that only bcopy mode is supported. > The old sdp code has been moved to > https://openib.org/svn/gen2/branches/sdp_historic
Isn't the usual way to first put out an RFC indicating you intend on doing this to solicit feedback as others may be using/depending on the trunk version ? > Please note that smaller LOC count does not mean less bugs yet - in fact, > while > the CMA code (mostly sdp_cma.c) is ready and works well for me, the data > transfer part is in active development, and I'm aware of several race > condition/data corruption issues which prevent it from being generally useful > just yet, and which I am in the process of addressing. Just wondering what the rush was to replace the existing trunk code with some less capable and more buggy ? Should this have waited until that was not the case ? -- Hal _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
