Quoting r. Sean Hefty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Subject: Re: [openib-general] Re: CMA: compliancy issue? > > Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > >I actually think all we have to do is to change CMA behaviour on REP: > >send RTU after, and not before, calling user handler. > >Since other ULPs don't seem t care when RTU is sent, they will continue > >working. > > I think that it makes more sense to give the user the CONNECT_RESPONSE > event, and have them call rdma_accept() or rdma_reject(), versus allowing > them to call rdma_reject() after an ESTABLISHED event. There is already > code for this; it's just tied to the existence of a QP off the rdma_cm_id.
OK, that's fine too. BTW I don't think SDP needs to see the RTU on the active side. -- MST _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
