On Wed, 2006-05-10 at 08:53 -0700, Roland Dreier wrote: > Thomas> I am planning to test this some more in the next few > Thomas> weeks, but what I'd really like to see is an IBTA > Thomas> 1.2-compliant implementation, and one that operated on > Thomas> work queue entries (not synchronous verbs). Is that being > Thomas> worked on? > > No current hardware supports that as far as I know. (Well, ipath > could fake it since they already implement all the verbs in software) >
I'm almost certain I'll be shot for saying this, but isn't there a danger of confusion with real FMRs when the HW shows up? If the benefit isn't there -- why do it if the application outcomes are almost certainly all bad? > - R. > _______________________________________________ > openib-general mailing list > [email protected] > http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general > > To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
