Quoting r. Hal Rosenstock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Subject: Re: [PATCH] OpenSM: Use memory routines directly and eliminate > cl_mem* routines > > On Wed, 2006-05-17 at 18:07, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > Quoting r. Hal Rosenstock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > Right now, there is memory > > > tracking code implemented. > > > > Doesn't MALLOC_CHECK_ do what you want? > > Yes, this looks good to me. Just a few questions: > > Is this in all glibc's that we would care about ?
I think it's been there since the dawn of time :) > I'm also not sure about the Windows implications here. Maybe Eitan can > comment. MSDN says: "When the application is linked with a debug version of the C run-time libraries, malloc resolves to _malloc_dbg. For more information about how the heap is managed during the debugging process, see Using C Run-Time Library Debugging Support." -- MST _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
