Hi Michael, I agree,
Let's make it even clearer: use sdp listen *:12865 use tcp destination 192.169.2.0/24 # tcp only to this destination use both destination 192.168.1.0/24 # sdp with fallback use both listen *:22 # ssh listening on both tcp and sdp sockets Eitan Zahavi Senior Engineering Director, Software Architect Mellanox Technologies LTD Tel:+972-4-9097208 Fax:+972-4-9593245 P.O. Box 586 Yokneam 20692 ISRAEL > -----Original Message----- > From: Michael S. Tsirkin > Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2006 2:02 PM > To: Eitan Zahavi > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [libsdp] RFC: Configuration file enhancements > > Quoting r. Eitan Zahavi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > 3. Today: "match_both" is not clearly described as applying to passive side only, > even though it does > > > > not have a meaning for "active" side (since connection is either on INET or > SDP) > > > > Change: Wrror on cases where the user specified match_both destination ? > > > > 4. Today: If connect over SDP fails an automatic fall back to INET socket is > performed > > > > Change: "match_fallback" should be used for active side rules when fallback is > required. Moreover > > > > "match" will not fallback - i.e. if SDP socket is required and fail - connect > will return an error. > > > > Thanks > > IMO, unmatch, match_both match_fallback are misleading names: you still do > matching in the same way, you supply a modifier affecting SDP/TCP > selection. > > How about we have an extra parameter to match directive? > It could be sdp, tcp, or both. > > Thus: > > match sdp listen *:12865 > match tcp destination 192.169.2.0/24 # tcp only to this destination > match both destination 192.168.1.0/24 # sdp with fallback > > -- > MST _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
