On Fri, May 19, 2006 at 12:15:29PM -0400, Hal Rosenstock wrote: > Are you aware of any currently that don't ?
Nope > In this case, IMO the penalty of including the GRH should be paid (until > those SMs are fixed) rather than adding any additional prefix checking > into the end node. I'm fine with that. It could always be added in later if it is a problem. Jason _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
