Quoting r. Roland Dreier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Subject: Re: Plans for libibverbs 1.1 > > Michael> What is meant by canonical repository? I assume > Michael> development will be done in git and svn will track some > Michael> git tree since early tasters seem to like it. > > Yeah, I guess that could work. But it doesn't really address the > issue of where to put libibverbs 1.0 vs. 1.1 in svn.
Right. > (And I'm not > sure git-svn can be used to keep two svn trees in sync from the same > git repository -- can it?) Assuming development is done in git, won't we just have two git trees - for 1.0 and for 1.1? -- MST _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
