Quoting r. Sean Hefty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Subject: RE: CMA backlog > > >This approach would affect all ULPs, however. For example, no SDP > >imlementation > >that I know of retries after a REJ - so this approach won't be interoperable. > >And AFAIK SDP spec already interprets reject as connection refused. > >There's no provision I cansee in SDP spec for retries on specific > >reject code. > > How did SDP expect to handle backlog then? Or was that a consideration?
Right. That's the only way I can see to correctly handle backlog in SDP. -- MST _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
