On Fri, 2006-06-02 at 13:10 -0700, Roland Dreier wrote: > Anton> Similar to libehca, I had to add a sysfs include to be able > Anton> to compile it. Am I missing something or is this correct? > > The issue is that I changed the development libibverbs tree in svn to > no longer use libsysfs, and libehca and libipathverbs are not updated > to the new interface yet. So it is true that they won't compile > against the development libibverbs tree without including the libsysfs > header, but it's also true that just adding the header so they compile > will lead to a driver library that doesn't work anyway. > > So I think it's better to leave them not compiling until they are > really fixed up.
We're in the middle of getting a new software release done here, and just haven't had the bandwidth to look at this yet. I'll get around to it hopefully by the middle of next week and do the appropriate updates from the libipathverbs end. Regards, Robert. -- Robert Walsh Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PathScale, Inc. Phone: +1 650 934 8117 2071 Stierlin Court, Suite 200 Fax: +1 650 428 1969 Mountain View, CA 94043.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
