> The following seems to work. How does it look? I don't think it's needed, and anyway I don't see how it fixes things. The problem only happens when the new CQ or QP has the same number as an old CQ/QP, so the test of cq->cqn == cqn might still pass even if the cq has changed (there's no guarantee the upper bits won't repeat -- or someone could be using 24 bits for index)
- R. _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
