Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > Another concern with this approach: consider an application that accepts > incoming MAD requests and drops some of them. With current code it can do > this > safely and remote side will retry. With the duplicate tracking in umad module > that you propose, MAD will stay in the list forever, and application will > never > again get called.
This is why I proposed a timeout for responses. > This kind of subtle behaviour change seems to me worse than outright ABI > breakage. If everyone is okay with breaking the ABI, then I would add send completion notification to umad, and put the responsibility on callers not to generate duplicate responses. - Sean _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
