Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > Here's an alternative idea: instead of making huge changes all over, how about > we delay passing the RMPP transaction up to the user until we have the ACK > with > the response window, and ask the user to give us back this ACK packet (or just > the window?) when he sends the response? Since we didn't support dual-sided > tansfers this extends rather than breaks both the ABI and the API.
I thought about this as well, and I think there was a discussion about doing this. The window size could be exchanged in the RMPP header if needed. We're kind of left with the same issue of trying to determine if a received MAD will generate a response. > The issue of duplicates can then be dealt with by Jack's patch, > detecting duplicate requests which does not require additional state. > > Sounds good? > If an alternative for handling DS RMPP can be found, I'm fine with this. - Sean _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
