Makes perfect sense. > -----Original Message----- > From: Hal Rosenstock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2006 7:11 AM > To: openib-general@openib.org > Cc: Eitan Zahavi > Subject: [PATCH] [MINOR} OpenSM/osm_port_info_rcv.c: Move assert to > beforewhere PortInfo is assumed > > OpenSM/osm_port_info_rcv.c: Move assert to before where PortInfo is > assumed as shouldn't be processing as PortInfo unless it really is > > Signed-off-by: Hal Rosenstock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Index: opensm/osm_port_info_rcv.c > =================================================================== > --- opensm/osm_port_info_rcv.c (revision 7961) > +++ opensm/osm_port_info_rcv.c (working copy) > @@ -683,6 +683,8 @@ osm_pi_rcv_process( > p_context = osm_madw_get_pi_context_ptr( p_madw ); > p_pi = (ib_port_info_t*)ib_smp_get_payload_ptr( p_smp ); > > + CL_ASSERT( p_smp->attr_id == IB_MAD_ATTR_PORT_INFO ); > + > /* On receipt of client reregister, clear the reregister bit so > reregistering won't be sent again and again */ > if ( ib_port_info_get_client_rereg( p_pi ) ) > @@ -698,8 +700,6 @@ osm_pi_rcv_process( > port_guid = p_context->port_guid; > node_guid = p_context->node_guid; > > - CL_ASSERT( p_smp->attr_id == IB_MAD_ATTR_PORT_INFO ); > - > osm_dump_port_info( > p_rcv->p_log, node_guid, port_guid, port_num, p_pi, OSM_LOG_DEBUG); > >
_______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list openib-general@openib.org http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
