Quoting r. Sean Hefty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Subject: Re: RFC: CMA backlog (was Re: CMA backlog)
> 
> Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > I'm just saying that we can use exactly the code in ib_destroy_cm_id, but
> > avoid calling ib_send_cm_rej in this one case:
> 
> Ah... yes, something like that should work.


Like this then (untested)?

Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Index: linux-2.6.17-2.6.18/drivers/infiniband/core/cm.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.17-2.6.18.orig/drivers/infiniband/core/cm.c       2006-06-27 
12:21:34.000000000 +0300
+++ linux-2.6.17-2.6.18/drivers/infiniband/core/cm.c    2006-06-27 
21:16:49.000000000 +0300
@@ -701,7 +701,7 @@ static void cm_reset_to_idle(struct cm_i
        }
 }
 
-void ib_destroy_cm_id(struct ib_cm_id *cm_id)
+static void cm_destroy_id(struct ib_cm_id *cm_id, int reject)
 {
        struct cm_id_private *cm_id_priv;
        struct cm_work *work;
@@ -731,9 +731,9 @@ retest:
                ib_cancel_mad(cm_id_priv->av.port->mad_agent, cm_id_priv->msg);
                spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cm_id_priv->lock, flags);
                ib_send_cm_rej(cm_id, IB_CM_REJ_TIMEOUT,
-                              &cm_id_priv->av.port->cm_dev->ca_guid,
-                              sizeof cm_id_priv->av.port->cm_dev->ca_guid,
-                              NULL, 0);
+                               &cm_id_priv->av.port->cm_dev->ca_guid,
+                               sizeof cm_id_priv->av.port->cm_dev->ca_guid,
+                               NULL, 0);
                break;
        case IB_CM_MRA_REQ_RCVD:
        case IB_CM_REP_SENT:
@@ -744,9 +744,14 @@ retest:
        case IB_CM_MRA_REQ_SENT:
        case IB_CM_REP_RCVD:
        case IB_CM_MRA_REP_SENT:
-               spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cm_id_priv->lock, flags);
-               ib_send_cm_rej(cm_id, IB_CM_REJ_CONSUMER_DEFINED,
-                              NULL, 0, NULL, 0);
+               if (reject) {
+                       spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cm_id_priv->lock, flags);
+                       ib_send_cm_rej(cm_id, IB_CM_REJ_CONSUMER_DEFINED,
+                                      NULL, 0, NULL, 0);
+               } else {
+                       cm_reset_to_idle(cm_id_priv);
+                       spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cm_id_priv->lock, flags);
+               }
                break;
        case IB_CM_ESTABLISHED:
                spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cm_id_priv->lock, flags);
@@ -775,6 +780,12 @@ retest:
        kfree(cm_id_priv->private_data);
        kfree(cm_id_priv);
 }
+
+void ib_destroy_cm_id(struct ib_cm_id *cm_id)
+{
+       cm_destroy_id(cm_id, 1);
+}
+
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(ib_destroy_cm_id);
 
 int ib_cm_listen(struct ib_cm_id *cm_id, __be64 service_id, __be64 
service_mask,
@@ -1163,7 +1174,7 @@ static void cm_process_work(struct cm_id
        }
        cm_deref_id(cm_id_priv);
        if (ret)
-               ib_destroy_cm_id(&cm_id_priv->id);
+               cm_destroy_id(&cm_id_priv->id, ret != -ENOMEM);
 }
 
 static void cm_format_mra(struct cm_mra_msg *mra_msg,

-- 
MST

_______________________________________________
openib-general mailing list
[email protected]
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general

To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general

Reply via email to