Rimmer, Todd wrote: > Shouldn't the cm_dup_req_handler in this case also resend the REP per > the IBTA passive side state machine "REP Sent" state?
The REP will already being retried based on a timeout. It could be resent immediately in response to a duplicate REQ as well, but that shouldn't be necessary, and actually makes things more complex, since coordination must be done between sending based on a timeout, versus receiving a duplicate REQ. - Sean _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
