Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > Quoting r. Or Gerlitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> From our experience on order K nodes cluster, we did not have issues >> with CM traffic, but: the CM traffic was not NxN but rather NxM where N >> was (say) 1K and M was (say) 16, the app being cluster file system - >> Lustre /VIBNAL which is the Lustre IB layer for the voltaire gen1 stack. > > Not sure what you mean by "did not have issues with CM traffic". Did no > packets > get lost? Did you run any other traffic on the same fabric, concurrently? I > also don't really see how do gen1 tests have any bearing on gen2 CMA.
The relevancy is simple: + it is IB + there are order K IB CM connections + it is in production, with the main IB apps being MPI && cluster fs I can't tell if part of the acceptance was "reconnecting" the file system with much other IB traffic in the air. Or. _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
