James Lentini wrote: > > On Tue, 11 Jul 2006, John Partridge wrote: > > >>The resulting build from your last patch has been installed and we >>are in the process of DAPL tests now. I do know that the libdat >>works with Intel MPI (although we had to manually create a symlink >>from libdat.so.1 to libdat.so - should this not already exist?) > > > Did you install dapl rpm or dapl-devel rpm? The dapl rpm should have > libdat.so.1 inside it.
I installed the dapl rpm. I do have libdat.so.1 but I also expect a symlink to libdat.so which does not exist (Intel MPI appears to need it) I also noticed that the dat.conf points to /usr/local/ofed/lib/libdaplcma.so but there is no symlink in the /usr/local/ofed/lib directory for it, I do have the libdaplcma.so.1 am I missing something here ? It's not a huge problem one can always create a symlink, but I'm just concerned I have something messed in my rpm. > > >>I do have one question about how the dapl RPM's are organized, we are >>creating a DAPL interface for the ccNUMA xpmem on SGI Altix systems. >>At the moment we have a libdat and libdapl(xpmem). It is our objective >>to use the OFED-1.0 libdat, as libdat will be used for non-infiniband >>interfaces I don't quite understand why libdat (dat.conf) are not a >>separate RPM and the libdapl interfaces installed in a separate RPM ? >>Would his not make more sense ? > > > The DAPL provider library can have an arbitrary name. You should name > your DAPL provider something unique (e.g. libdaplxpmem). OK that makes sense, but my point was should the libdat be a seperate rpm from the libdapl libs ? Thanks John -- John Partridge Silicon Graphics Inc Tel: 651-683-3428 Vnet: 233-3428 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
