Hal Rosenstock wrote: >>>and running multiple copies of opensm on different systems. >> >>Not sure what that would fail. The other SMs should be standbys. I can't >>think of what would fail in osmtest off the top of my head but haven't >>tried this yet but am now about to.
I was starting / stopping openSM on different systems soon before running the tests. Whenever I started it on one of my systems, it would always become the master and reassign LIDs. > I think I see what might be going on. To confirm, can you increase the > transaction timeout on the osmtest side and see if that helps ? > Something like: > > osmtest -f a -t 1000 Thanks - I'll try to rerun the tests and see if I get similar behavior. The failure I was seeing was while running osmtest -f c. If I'm remembering correctly, the second query of that test wasn't getting a response. - Sean _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
