> this does not have to be a false positive! > It is not legal to take ANY non-hardirq safe lock after having taken a > lock that's used in hardirq context. > (having said that the skb_queue_tail lock needs a special treatment for > some real false positives; Linus merged that already)
... > Now this assumes your queue is shared with the networking stack, Right, understood -- but ipoib has a private skb queue. Which is why I said it was a false positive. Thanks, Roland _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
