Quoting r. Roland Dreier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Subject: Re: [openib-general] 2 patches in mst-for-2.6.18 > > > [PATCH] IB/ipoib: fix packet loss after hardware address update > > Hm, OK I guess. Are we sure that the memcmp in the data path is OK?
I did some measurements with netperf and did not notice any change. > > [PATCH] IB/mad: validate MADs for spec compliance C13-18.1.1 > > Seems fine but I wonder why the ib_response_mad function moved into a > public header. Oops, looks like I picked some wrong bits from svn. Will redo the patch tomorrow - or try picking the patch from svn by yourself. > Also, how does this patch do this: > > > Also verify that RMPP MADs are data only, to avoid a userspace > > app causing a kernel crash by sending non-data MADs. > > what is the crash? And how does adding a check for the BM class fix this? I'll let Sean address these. -- MST _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
