Arne Redlich wrote: > I only took a rather superficial look at the code. But since the invalid > GID REJ is treated with such care, I guess it's intentional and not a > bug?
I would lean more towards it being a bug. The data in the CM REQ is wrong. (There's a difference between rejecting a request to another GID, versus the GID carried in the request being bogus.) In any case, an argument can be made that this change fixes a compliancy issue in the IB CM. If the change corrects the problem for you, I will commit it. - Sean _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
